The August 7, 1998 bomb
blasts in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam have generated volumes of discussion.
But as the talk increased the victims’ voices steadily declined. In many
respects the victims have been turned into spectators in the aftermath
of the tragedy.
This is not entirely surprising
given the manner we have chosen to define and respond to conflicts. In
courts of law, which are the primary conflict resolution mechanism, hardly
are victims given the chance to lament, search for badly needed answers,
and embark on the journey to healing. Psychologists have advised us that
being able to retell a story is a sure indicator of overcoming trauma.
It would seem that the story of the blast victims has been taken away
from them. They are no longer at the center of the grieving and mourning.
Their search for healing has taken a public dimension and for many of
them this may result in secondary victimization.
Individual stories are
painful. Most of us would prefer to insulate ourselves from the pain.
The reality is that the nation can heal only when the pains of individuals
are validated. We cannot afford to deal with victims as statistics. We
must create conditions for individuals who know the story to shape
it. There are many victims who are looking back at their lives and picking
any sin they committed that merited the wrath of their ancestors, God
or other supernatural beings. Friends and relatives are thinking the dead
deserved to die for one reason or another. Victims are blaming themselves
for being alive because they believe they were in a position to do something
to prevent the death or injury of their friends and relatives.
Victims need information
on what happened and why it happened. The victims of the
bomb blasts, including friends and relatives, need to know what transpired
on August 7, and why the bomb had to be detonated at that particular place.
This task is made difficult now that the main trials will take place thousands
of miles from East Africa. The governments of Nairobi, Dar and Washington,
as well as the media, should consider it a priority to relay information
on the trial, particularly the testimony of the accused people, to the
victims.
Victims need opportunities
to have their anger, fear and pains validated. Kenyans, Tanzanians and
Americans need to provide the space for the victims to express their anger
not just in counseling sessions but with neighbors, workmates and the
general community. In this respect it is most unfortunate that the trials
will not take place where many victims will get to tell their truth. However,
as a symbolic gesture, representatives of victims should be allowed to
attend court and tell their story.
It would be a worthwhile
idea to create conditions for victims to mourn, lament and make the story
of the blast their own. It is very African for people to provide support
for each other in times of grief. Grieving in isolation as it seems to
be the case now may not be very healthy for the victims. Healing groups
for victims may be one way of helping victims move from being victims
to becoming survivors.
Victims need to be empowered
so that they "have a sense of control in the resolution of their
cases." For example, the victims should be made part of the decision
making process for the National Bomb Blast Fund and other rebuilding programs.
At a symbolic level, this places victims in control of their lives.
Victims need an "experience
of justice." Soon after the tragedy, most victims may harbor feelings
of revenge and cry for the blood of the criminals. As time goes by many
of them will need assurances that the offenders realize what they did
to fellow humans. The "experience of justice" will be much wider
than a court conviction.
Victims require an assurance
that what happened will not be repeated and that concrete steps must be
seen to be taken towards this end. The establishment of a disaster preparedness
unit and beefing up security in buildings needs to be taken up with alacrity.
Victims need restitution.
This can be done symbolically. Victims need not be reminded by anyone
that a check will not replace their loved ones. They know that only too
well. However, a symbolic gesture of restitution in critical in the healing
process.
The case of the East African
bombings is extremely complicated given the varied circumstances, the
international angle to the crime and the lack of precedence. How can we
make the offenders accountable? How can we mend the relationships? How
can we make the victims feel human again? The easy way out is to feel
helpless and despair. However, how we respond to this tragedy will shape
our narrative of peace in a most fundamental way. Those who responded
in generosity on August 7 made an excellent introduction to the narrative
of community building and healing. Kenyans, Tanzanians, and Americans
cannot afford to let them down. And, there is no short cut; we must cry
together, return names to the faces that deeply suffered and then weave
our story of peace – string by string.
Joseph
Ayindo Babu is a graduate of the MA program. He is currently working
wtih Amani Peoples Theatre in Kenya.